Top News

|  DP World reports 10.7% gross volume growth in Q2 2017  |    |  Major Ports post combined net surplus of INR 2820 cr in FY 2017  |    |  Odisha sets a target to reach INR 1 lakh cr exports by 2025  |    |  Shapoorji Pallonji Group to spend INR 2,000 cr in Odisha Gopalpur Port  |    |  Air India SATS Airport Services launches mobile app for tracking cargo  |    |  IndiGo & Jet introduce additional flights to Doha, Mumbai from Kozhikode  |    |  Port of Rotterdam registers impressive container throughput rise in H1  |    |  New waterways to connect India with Bangladesh  |    |  Yang Ming to start New Korea-Taiwan-Hong Kong service  |    |  DFC to be commissioned in 2 years  |    |  Domestic air traffic up 20% in June  |    |  No new port in 100 km vicinity of major ports  |    |  IRCTC to install 1,100 water vending machines at railway stations  |    |  Port of Antwerp first half volume increases by 1.9% to 5,143,305 TEU  |    |  Asia-Europe rate falls 2.1% to USD 919 TEU, declines 3.1% to USWC  |    |  Operations at international cargo terminal likely to begin soon  |    |  Haicang Port sees 1H cargo rise 20.7% to 3.12 million TEU  |    |  Bahri gets delivery of 39th VLCC, strengthens its leading position  |    |  Shreyas Shipping & Logistics signs MoA to acquire one Multipurpose vessel  |    |  Businessman to sell 12% stake in CIAL  |   
You are here: Home » National News » Shipping» CCI clears Maersk firm of anti-competition charges

CCI clears Maersk firm of anti-competition charges

13 February 2017 | New Delhi
 

transreproter

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided that joint ventures or subsidiaries of Maersk-owned APM Terminals have not contravened provisions of competition law relating to abuse of dominant behaviour, as they are not in a dominant position.

The group’s companies include Gateway Terminals India Private Limited (GTIPL), APM Terminals Pipavav/ Gujarat Pipavav Port, APM Terminals Inland Services (Main), APM Terminals Inland Services (Annex) and APM Terminals Management B.V. At the JN Port in Navi Mumbai, GTIPL’s cargo traffic has been declining since 2014-15 when it stood at 45.16%; 45.06% in 2014-15 and 41.42% in 2015-16. Moreover, newer terminals have either begun functioning or are expected to start operations, said CCI.

Moreover, Nhava Sheva (India) Gateway Terminal Private Limited, being developed by DP World, has been partially operational since April 2015 and Bharat Mumbai Container Terminals Private Limited, being developed by PSA International, is expected to commence its operations by the end of 2017.

“In the absence of dominance, the Commission was of the view that the alleged conduct of Gateway Terminals India (GTI) need not be examined no case of contravention of any of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against in the present case.”

The commission also refuted allegations regarding bundling of services by the APM Terminal Group companies in the container freight station space by referring to the large number of container freight stations (CFS) in and around JN Port.

Moreover, a notification of the customs department of the Government of India stipulates that the usage of a particular CFS facility is entirely the prerogative of a consignee, and in the absence of the consignee making this choice, shipping lines may nominate the CFS facility.

Thus, the selection of CFS service providers at ports does not always lie with the shipping lines, CCI said.

It also noted that GTIPL had started ‘Direct Port Delivery’ (DPD) facility to accredited and approved consignees.

The facility enables GTIPL to directly deliver goods to the consignees without intervention of any CFS operator.

   
Transreproter Logo