Top News

|  Essar Shipping loss widens to INR 176 crore in Q4  |    |  200 MW solar projects to come up at major ports  |    |  Paradip Port awarded for 2nd highest Traffic growth by Ministry of Shipping  |    |  Aviation ministry to plan path for Air India this week  |    |  Mundra ports quarterly profit up 27% to USD 182.6 million, sales up 18%  |    |  April air cargo rates up as Asia-North America volumes rise  |    |  DHL adds another China-Europe rail link  |    |  Railways to seek Cabinet nod for INR 35,000 cr development fund  |    |  Fraport profit soars 24.5% to USD 20.2 million, revenues rise 3.5%  |    |  CONCOR to start train service from ICD Agra to Mundra Port  |    |  Indian Railways will export 18 diesel locomotives to Myanmar  |    |  Korea seaport cargo up 6.6% in April  |    |  Toyota and Mitsubishi hope to run container port near Indonesian car plants  |    |  PMRDA to start work on ring road by October  |    |  AADA raises China-Australia rate USD 300 TEU July 1  |    |  PPT gets Shipping Ministry award  |    |  Centre govt. plans to upgrade vessel repairing facilities at 7 ports  |    |  Visakhapatnam Port to be modernised by 2019  |    |  CMA CGM launches 2nd loop between India, Mideast &Africa  |    |  Cochin Port to commemorate arrival of 1st vessel  |   
You are here: Home » National News » Shipping» CCI clears Maersk firm of anti-competition charges

CCI clears Maersk firm of anti-competition charges

13 February 2017 | New Delhi


The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided that joint ventures or subsidiaries of Maersk-owned APM Terminals have not contravened provisions of competition law relating to abuse of dominant behaviour, as they are not in a dominant position.

The group’s companies include Gateway Terminals India Private Limited (GTIPL), APM Terminals Pipavav/ Gujarat Pipavav Port, APM Terminals Inland Services (Main), APM Terminals Inland Services (Annex) and APM Terminals Management B.V. At the JN Port in Navi Mumbai, GTIPL’s cargo traffic has been declining since 2014-15 when it stood at 45.16%; 45.06% in 2014-15 and 41.42% in 2015-16. Moreover, newer terminals have either begun functioning or are expected to start operations, said CCI.

Moreover, Nhava Sheva (India) Gateway Terminal Private Limited, being developed by DP World, has been partially operational since April 2015 and Bharat Mumbai Container Terminals Private Limited, being developed by PSA International, is expected to commence its operations by the end of 2017.

“In the absence of dominance, the Commission was of the view that the alleged conduct of Gateway Terminals India (GTI) need not be examined no case of contravention of any of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against in the present case.”

The commission also refuted allegations regarding bundling of services by the APM Terminal Group companies in the container freight station space by referring to the large number of container freight stations (CFS) in and around JN Port.

Moreover, a notification of the customs department of the Government of India stipulates that the usage of a particular CFS facility is entirely the prerogative of a consignee, and in the absence of the consignee making this choice, shipping lines may nominate the CFS facility.

Thus, the selection of CFS service providers at ports does not always lie with the shipping lines, CCI said.

It also noted that GTIPL had started ‘Direct Port Delivery’ (DPD) facility to accredited and approved consignees.

The facility enables GTIPL to directly deliver goods to the consignees without intervention of any CFS operator.

Transreproter Logo