Top News

|  Volvo Auto India to hike prices by up to 2% from April  |    |  CSL to raise INR 1,400-1,500 cr through IPO  |    |  PNC Infratech wins INR 2,720-cr highway projects from NHAI  |    |  Damietta port throughput in January increases 31% to 87,800 TEU  |    |  Global container traffic up 4% in Q4 2016, Port Klang growth leads top 20  |    |  Pawan Hans to start Dilli Darshan chopper rides at INR 2,500  |    |  Port of Virginia is gearing up to handle 13,000-TEU plus ships  |    |  Govt. approves INR 2,029 cr project for JNPT channel expansion  |    |  SpiceJet to fly Kolkata-Dhaka daily  |    |  Dilip Buildcon declared successful bidder for INR 3,269 cr road projects  |    |  Ashok Leyland eyes stronger presence in logistics industry  |    |  APL to launch new CS5 to boost intra-Asia service network  |    |  Ethiopian Airlines adds Ahmedabad to its air cargo services  |    |  IWAI raises INR 340 cr through infrastructure bonds  |    |  Rail freight corridor may lead to lower bidding for road projects  |    |  Move to hike Vallarpadam handling charges opposed  |    |  AirAsia India announces two new routes  |    |  UK port volumes drop 3% in 2016 to total 473.5 mt  |    |  Air India to launch direct flight from Amritsar to Birmingham  |    |  BlackBuck raises nearly INR 476 cr from Sands Capital and existing investors  |   
You are here: Home » National News » Shipping» CCI clears Maersk firm of anti-competition charges

CCI clears Maersk firm of anti-competition charges

13 February 2017 | New Delhi


The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided that joint ventures or subsidiaries of Maersk-owned APM Terminals have not contravened provisions of competition law relating to abuse of dominant behaviour, as they are not in a dominant position.

The group’s companies include Gateway Terminals India Private Limited (GTIPL), APM Terminals Pipavav/ Gujarat Pipavav Port, APM Terminals Inland Services (Main), APM Terminals Inland Services (Annex) and APM Terminals Management B.V. At the JN Port in Navi Mumbai, GTIPL’s cargo traffic has been declining since 2014-15 when it stood at 45.16%; 45.06% in 2014-15 and 41.42% in 2015-16. Moreover, newer terminals have either begun functioning or are expected to start operations, said CCI.

Moreover, Nhava Sheva (India) Gateway Terminal Private Limited, being developed by DP World, has been partially operational since April 2015 and Bharat Mumbai Container Terminals Private Limited, being developed by PSA International, is expected to commence its operations by the end of 2017.

“In the absence of dominance, the Commission was of the view that the alleged conduct of Gateway Terminals India (GTI) need not be examined no case of contravention of any of the provisions of Section 4 of the Act is made out against in the present case.”

The commission also refuted allegations regarding bundling of services by the APM Terminal Group companies in the container freight station space by referring to the large number of container freight stations (CFS) in and around JN Port.

Moreover, a notification of the customs department of the Government of India stipulates that the usage of a particular CFS facility is entirely the prerogative of a consignee, and in the absence of the consignee making this choice, shipping lines may nominate the CFS facility.

Thus, the selection of CFS service providers at ports does not always lie with the shipping lines, CCI said.

It also noted that GTIPL had started ‘Direct Port Delivery’ (DPD) facility to accredited and approved consignees.

The facility enables GTIPL to directly deliver goods to the consignees without intervention of any CFS operator.

Transreproter Logo